Britain's Strikes against Yemen: Unveiling Britain's Neo-Colonial Ambitions and a Shift in London's Middle East Strategy

137
Without comment
Britain's Strikes against Yemen: Unveiling Britain's Neo-Colonial Ambitions and a Shift in London's Middle East Strategy
Britain's Strikes against Yemen: Unveiling Britain's Neo-Colonial Ambitions and a Shift in London's Middle East Strategy
In recent years, the British government has undergone a dramatic shift in its Middle East approach, with a clear ambition to reclaim its traditional role as a neo-colonial, balancing force. This recalibration of strategy, which gained momentum in the aftermath of the United States' 2003 invasion of Iraq, has reached its zenith in the aftermath of Brexit, further accentuating the United Kingdom's distinct international trajectory.

By: A. Mahdavi



At its core, the British government has long sought to assume a position of influential leadership within the global scene. With a keen understanding of the evolving dynamics within the international system and the waning hegemony of the United States, London has embarked upon a redefinition of its role across various political, military, and economic domains. One particular objective of the British government is to reclaim its leadership role within Europe. The absence of a single, dominant leader within the European Union presents a unique opportunity for London to position itself as the true leader of the continent. By extricating itself from the European Union, Britain seeks to seize this occasion to assert its political leadership without the encumbrances of membership obligations and financial entanglements.



In addition to Britain's recognition of the sweeping changes occurring within the international system, it is imperative to acknowledge the significance of the politicians who shape the country's executive policies. These individuals, often trusted by the British royal court, formulate foreign policy strategies utilizing their experience and political prowess. Essentially, the British government, as the executive branch, is duty-bound to implement the overarching decisions conveyed through parliamentary channels.



Let us now delve into Britain's primary role and motivations in its involvement with the Yemeni conflict and its recent joint strikes against Yemen’s Ansarullah movement.



The British government launched an aerial assault on Ansarullah military targets, closely coordinating with the United States, sending an ominous message to the international community, particularly Europe, that it is willing to participate in a fresh round of wars in the Middle East.



As the British government undoubtedly harbors ulterior motivations for its participation in these illegal military strikes beyond its long-term objectives, among these motivations are the significance of maritime trade in the Red Sea and the potential repercussions for its crisis-stricken economy.



Furthermore, it appears that the British administration, led by Rishi Sunak, seeks to wield a trump card in its foreign policy arsenal for the forthcoming House of Commons elections. By deceptively presenting itself as a champion of British national interests through invoking the specter of war, 10 Downing Street hopes to exploit fears to improve the Tory party's prospects in the elections.



Following the attack on Yemen, Sunak, in desperate for self-defense, pedged to address the reasons behind this action without prior coordination with the House of Commons. Remarkably, a number of liberal representatives voiced objections, expressing concern over the government's bypassing of parliamentary oversight.



Moreover, it is worth noting that the leaders of British parties emphasized that if the government intends to escalate its actions and adopt an aggressive approach, it must first apprise the parliament of the necessity of such actions and then seek approval through voting. This stance may have compelled the British government to withdraw from contemplated actions and reconsider the deployment of its aircraft carrier to the Red Sea.



The implications of this recent act of aggression for British interests in the region remain uncertain, while Ansarullah has declared that British targets will be considered legitimate military objectives. The unfolding events in the region over the coming days will prove dangerous for British citizens, potentially reshaping their destiny.
There are no comments for this article
Comment
Post a comment for this article

Similar post

Follow the similar posts
defeat and humiliation for Israel and a victory for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar

defeat and humiliation for Israel and a victory for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar

Jul 11 2024
another October 7 will take plac

another October 7 will take plac

Jul 11 2024
Israel assassinates Hezbollah leaders and we pay the price

Israel assassinates Hezbollah leaders and we pay the price

Jul 11 2024
The War on Children

The War on Children

Jul 09 2024
Next please

Next please

Jul 09 2024
After Gaza   Targeting Southern Lebanon ‏

After Gaza Targeting Southern Lebanon ‏

Jul 09 2024
While Palestine is in genocide the German parliament was busy to ban the red inverted triangle

While Palestine is in genocide the German parliament was busy to ban the red inverted triangle

Jul 09 2024
why Israel shouldn’t exist

why Israel shouldn’t exist

Jul 09 2024