French New Immigration Law: A Paradigm Shift in the Land of Liberté, Égalité, and Fraternité?

French New Immigration Law: A Paradigm Shift in the Land of Liberté, Égalité, and Fraternité?
After a lengthy 18 months of deliberation, last Tuesday marked a pivotal moment for France as the European nation witnessed the enactment of a new immigration bill, harbingering the first significant change in the past four decades. The bill received resounding support in the Lower House, with 349 votes in favor and 186 against, while prior approval in the French Senate garnered 214 votes in favor and 114 against. Notably, Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right “Rassemblement National," decried this controversial law as an ideological victory.

By: A. Mahdavi

This is while Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the head of the leftist “La France Insoumise,” described the rare consensus between Macron’s party and Le Pen as nothing but "pathetic."



Unveiling the New Immigration Bill

Originally rejected by opposition parties and deemed unworthy of consideration, the bill experienced a remarkable twist as a special parliamentary committee promptly assembled and presented a revised, more stringent text. The bill aligned closely with the views of the extreme right, successfully securing their support. The bill introduces measures to curtail access to welfare benefits for foreigners and imposes greater hurdles for foreign students seeking permanent residency in France. Furthermore, a critical provision conditions the receipt of certain social security benefits for foreigners on either spending five years in France or working for 30 months within the country. Additionally, the bill empowers the government to take decisive action against illegal workers in sectors grappling with labor shortages, such as construction and healthcare.



Rifts in the Macron Administration and the Quest for Majority

Despite lacking a parliamentary majority, the French government heralded the passage of the bill as a significant personal triumph for the beleaguered President Macron, even though it ultimately relied on the support of the extreme right. However, the bill's true victory seems to resonate more with Ms. Le Pen, who attributes this outcome to her party's tireless efforts. Moreover, this development has given rise to divisions within the centrist majority, with speculation mounting that these differences may intensify and lead to the resignation of certain cabinet ministers. The resignation of the Minister of Health has already set this trend in motion.

Furthermore, the bill faced opposition from numerous government supporters, some of whom voted against or abstained, underscoring profound differences and rifts within the Macron administration itself. Critics argue that the bill's core foundations are steeped in far-right ideology, raising concerns that Macron's administration has inadvertently bolstered the chances of Le Pen to win the next presidential race.

In fact, this law is a significant departure from the aspirations of many French citizens who cast their votes in 2022, hoping to prevent the rise of right-wing ideas and policies in the country. Macron's policies have eroded the credibility of the moderates, while the government contends that this strategic maneuver will control the extreme right's influence in the upcoming European parliamentary elections. Nevertheless, many progressive movements and opposition groups vehemently reject this argument altogether.



Human Rights and the Erosion of France's International Prestige

France has long prided itself on being a staunch champion of freedom of speech and human rights, cultivating an international image as one of the world's freest nations. Now all is gone into the air. As a matter of fact, the approval of this bill has dealt a substantial blow to France's prestige and its carefully constructed reputation. Over fifty NGOs, including the French Human Rights Union, issued a joint statement decrying this bill as the most regressive legislation in the past four decades, impacting the rights and living conditions of foreigners, including long-term residents. Comparisons have been drawn, with some asserting that this bill is even harsher than Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s policies, potentially igniting social tensions within France.

By prioritizing the interests of white citizens, this bill contradicts the moral principles France has historically championed, leading to a divergence in global public opinion and perceptions of the nation. Undoubtedly, this presented a formidable quandary for President Macron, who endeavors to frame this bill within the scope of his slogans, economic programs, and social initiatives. However, the reality remains that this decision has ruined the political future of his party, and its implications will become increasingly apparent in the years to come.