General Soleimani’s assassination case in international courts: legal strategies

43
Without comment
General Soleimani’s assassination case in international courts: legal strategies

Part 2


The US crime of targeting senior Iranian and Iraqi military officials on January 3, 2020, is likely to be prosecuted in international courts as a clear instance of terrorist activity. General Soleimani’s assassination may be prosecuted under the 1973 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Supported Persons, including Political Agents, which both the Iranian and US governments have ratified. Despite the fact that the US action against the Iraqi government is an example of a violation against a sovereign state that comes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC), bringing a case before the ICC is exceedingly difficult owing to the US’s reluctance to recognise the court’s authority. The ideal answer to this problem would be to form a joint court in Iraq composed of Iranian and Iraqi legal experts. However, given the US’s hegemony over the UN Security Council, creating such a court would be difficult, precluding Iraqi courts from exercising jurisdiction. However, using the capabilities of other UN bodies, such as the General Assembly, or other international organisations, most notably the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), as well as relying on the Senegal Tribunal’s experience, may assist in developing a successful proceeding. Meanwhile, litigation in Iran’s internal court is both helpful and essential politically and morally. However, there are concerns regarding how the penalty would be applied to US federal personnel under this alternative. Another alternative is to litigate in federal courts in the United States. State immunity and the method in which the judgement is applied do not block the process, but they do need the use of a suitable approach. However, the US authorities contemplated rejecting such claims or refusing to intervene to prevent a judgement in favour of the Iranian plaintiffs. Thus, although it is ideal to form a court in cooperation with regional organisations such as the OIC if this is not feasible, it is better to send the matter to the International Court of Justice under the 1973 Convention.

There are no comments for this article
Comment
Post a comment for this article

Similar post

Follow the similar posts
Navigating the UN Security Council's Mechanisms: A Blessing or a Curse?

Navigating the UN Security Council's Mechanisms: A Blessing or a Curse?

Apr 15 2024
Israel's Withdrawal from Gaza: Did Hamas Win the Battle for Hearts and Minds?

Israel's Withdrawal from Gaza: Did Hamas Win the Battle for Hearts and Minds?

Apr 15 2024
Breaking Chains: International Quds Day's Message of Defiance Against Israeli Genocide in Gaza

Breaking Chains: International Quds Day's Message of Defiance Against Israeli Genocide in Gaza

Apr 07 2024
Echoes of Tragedy: Israeli Terrorist Strike on Gaza Food Distribution Center

Echoes of Tragedy: Israeli Terrorist Strike on Gaza Food Distribution Center

Apr 07 2024
International Quds Day: The Endless Quest for Palestinian Liberation

International Quds Day: The Endless Quest for Palestinian Liberation

Apr 07 2024
Facing the Abyss: The Zionist Regime's Desperate Moves Against the Yemeni Maritime Blockade

Facing the Abyss: The Zionist Regime's Desperate Moves Against the Yemeni Maritime Blockade

Mar 19 2024
Lebanon’s Complex Ethno-Demographic Landscape and the Lingering Presidential Vacuum

Lebanon’s Complex Ethno-Demographic Landscape and the Lingering Presidential Vacuum

Mar 19 2024
Israel in Turmoil: What Economic Challenges Does the Zionist Regime Face Following Operation Al-Aqsa Storm?

Israel in Turmoil: What Economic Challenges Does the Zionist Regime Face Following Operation Al-Aqsa Storm?

Mar 10 2024